YES! So much truth to this, thank you for writing this.
I want to bring something to the conversation that given your use of the word, you haven't realised yourself.
I worked as a Detective investigating sexual offences for many years. We replaced the use of the word "allegation" for the word "report" because the word allegation straight away brings an element of doubt. It's very definition suggests there is no proof.
It's very definition is: "“A claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof.”"
When the victim “alleges” and the perpetrator “says,” who sounds more believable? Who sounds more sincere, certain, and steadfast? Who sounds like they have a clearer account of the incident in question?
Straight away it creates a bias and casts doubt on what the victim says.
Ideally we would put the word allegation on what the perpetrator says. Doesn't this sound stronger:
"Four women report incidents of sexual abuse by Russell Brand. Russell Brand alleges all his sexual interactions were consenual."
I passionately believe that if the media and all writers incorporate this very small tweak of semantics, the power imbalance in the media wouldn't be so rife between the perpetrator and victim.
If you are interested, I explain this more concisely in the piece I've linked to below.
I promise I'm not spamming you with a "read my piece". I am so passionate about this, helping victims of sexual violence and recognising what language is most appropriate and powerful for victims.
